Showing posts with label William Seymour. Show all posts
Showing posts with label William Seymour. Show all posts

Thursday, March 6, 2014

Design Patents In the Modern World - Academic Day Compedium

Last April, Stanford Law School hosted a symposium on the subject of Design Patents in the Modern World.  We followed the symposium closely last year because it was the largest gathering of design patent practitioners, scholars, and owners ever in one place, as far as we can tell.  The Design Patents in the Modern World conference, and other like it last year, signals that design patents have truly arrived as an important, and well-respected form of intellectual property that is finally being used in the manner it was always intended.

Last night, the Stanford Technology Law Review published a compendium of articles discussed and presented during the academic day at last year's conference as Volume 17, Issue 1 of the publication. From the editors - "[t]he Articles in this issue are leading scholarship on design patents, on topics ranging from the doctrine’s theoretical underpinnings, to the scope of design patent protection, to the proper remedy for infringement."

Each of the design patent articles published by the Stanford Technology Law Review last night is a must-read for any design patent enthusiast.  Here is the complete compendium (350 pages), or you can link to each of the articles individually, below.  Enjoy!

Progress and Competition in Design
Mark P. McKenna & Katherine J. Strandburg

Functionality and Graphical User Interface Design Patents
Michael Risch

Virtual Designs
Jason J. Du Mont & Mark D. Janis

(R)evolution in Design Patentable Subject Matter: The Shifting Meaning of “Article of Manufacture”
William J. Seymour & Andrew W. Torrance

A Rational System of Design Patent Remedies
Mark A. Lemley

Overlapping Intellectual Property Doctrines: Election of Rights Versus Selection of Remedies
Laura A. Heymann

Design Patents: Law Without Design
Peter Lee & Madhavi Sunder

Moving Beyond the Standard Criticisms of Design Patents
Sarah Burstein

Monday, March 25, 2013

Design Patent Links


The last few weeks have seen a flurry of design patent activity, ranging from academia, Computer-Generated Icons, and even the fashion industry.  It’s far too much to post about separately, so, without further ado, we give you this week’s Design Patent Links!

“The Fashion Law” blog is reporting on Stella McCartney’s design patent for a bestselling Lucia mesh polka dot dress from her Fall 2012 collection.  The London based company’s design patent arrived just in time for fashion week.  According to New York Law School’s “Legal As She is Spoke” blog suggested that McCartney’s design patent was just for publicity, “but could prove not to be all that helpful.”

Real Housewifes of New York star and owner/inventor of Yummie Tummie Heather, Thomson, might beg to differ with Legal As She Spoke. Yummie Tummie was sued by shapewear heavy hitter Spanx on March 5, seeking a declaratory judgment of noninfringement of several of Ms. Thomson’s design patents after Yummie sent Spanx cease and desist letters concerning Spanx’s design patents.  The National Law Review provided a nice summary of this shapewear design patent case. Many other outfits are also covering the story, including IPWatchdog, Womens Wear Daily, New York Magazine, and the Huffington Post.  But what several commentators failed to mention is that this is not Yummie Tummie’s first design patent rodeo.  As we have mentioned before on this blog, Yummie Tummie settled a declaratory judgment action brought by Maidenform after Maidenform paid Yummie Tummie 6.75 Million.  In 2011, Yummie Tummie also filed a design patent infringement action against LF USA, a subsidiary of the Hong Kong-based apparel manufacturer Li & Fung, Ltd.  Yummie Tummie has aggressively defended its design patents in the past, and we suspect this case will be no different.  Spanx may be surprised by how not “Yummie” this case might become for them.

As design patents continue to gain credibility with practitioners, academia is also beginning to take note. On April 5-6, 2013, Stanford Law School will host “a major conference on design patents,” titled “Design Patents in the Modern World.” The conference is sponsored by the Stanford Program in Law, Science, & Technology, Samsung Electronics, Nike, and Google and will include public conference on April 5 and a one-day academic symposium with papers on design patents from the leading scholars in the world on design patent issues. Included among the articles slated for discussion is an article co-authored by yours truly and University of Kansas School of Law professor Andrew Torrance. The article is titled “(R)evolution in Design Patent Subject Matter: The Shifting Meaning of ‘Article of Manufacture,” and provides an historical review of the “article of manufacture” requirement in design patent law. Stanford’s design patent conference will be open to the public.