This week brings
us three new design patent cases, two of which concern design patents for
apparel. The first case deals with a design
patent for a shapewear garment designed to remedy so-called “bingo arms.” Although such garments may have
functional aspects, prior shapewear design patent cases have yielded surprising results. See,
e.g., Maidenform
v. Yummie Tummie. The second
deals with apparel of the K-9 variety and pits one dog collar maker against
another.
Place your bets after the jump!
R and
A Synergy, LLC et al v. IdeaVillage Products Corp. et al, No.
1:13-cv-00130 (N.D. OH. January 18, 2013).
On January 18, Idea
Village (among others) was sued for design patent infringement by R & A
Synergy and its licensee, Magic Tap. The
complaint alleges that a garment product called “Amazing Arms” infringes R
& A’s Design Patent Nos. 646,869 and 663,925, both entitled “Garment.” Given that the garments at issue appear to be
shapewear garments, functionality will likely be a central issue in this
case. The case has been assigned to
Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr. R & A is
represented by Fay Sharpe, LLP. Below is
a figure from the ‘869 Patent alongside an image of a garment from www.getamazingarms.com, which was
referenced in the complaint:
Lightstream, Inc. v. Atomic Products, LLC, No. 3:13-cv-00050 (D. WI. January 23, 2013)
On January 23,
Plaintiff Lightstream filed a patent infringement complaint against Atomic
Products (dba Visiglo), accusing Visiglo of infringing one utility patent and
its Design Patent No. 457,299 for an “Electro-Luminescent Welt.” Lightstream accuses Visiglo of selling
certain “dog collars that include mountable electroluminescent welts,” in
violation of Lightstream’s design patent.
The case has been assigned to Judge William M. Conley. Lightstream is represented by Mann Law Group
and Whitaker Law Group. Below is a
figure from the ‘299 Patent alongside an image of the Visiglo dog collar, as
shown in the complaint:
OraLabs, Inc. v. The Kind Group LLC,
No. 1:13-cv-00170 (D. Colo. January 24, 2013)
On January 24,
Plaintiff OraLabs filed a declaratory judgment complaint against The Kind
Group, seeking a declaration of noninfringement and invalidity of The Kind
Group’s Design Patent No. 644,939 for a “Spherically-Shaped Lip Balm.” At issue is OraLab’s Chap-Ice® line of
products including a new product known as Chap-Ice® Lip Revolution. Apparently OraLabs filed this complaint after
receiving a cease and desist letter from The Kind Group on January 18. The case has been assigned to Judge Philip
Brimmer. Oralabs is represented by
Sheridan Ross P.C. Below is a figure
from the ‘939 Patent alongside an image of OraLab’s Chap-Ice® Lip Revolution
product, as shown in The Kind Group’s cease and desist letter:
No comments :
Post a Comment