Christopher
Carani of McAndrews, Held & Malloy wrote an excellent analysis of Apple’s
smartphone litigation with Samsung and several other design patent cases in an
effort to discern some overall guidelines for assessing design patent
infringement under the ordinary observer test. Mr. Carani’s article was re-posted by
permission on Patently-O.
Speaking of Apple v. Samsung, the German version of
their ongoing design patent war will be delayed after some fancy footwork by
Samsung in the EU Trademark Office in Alicante, Spain, as reported by Bloomberg.
Stephen L.
Peterson of Finnegan, Henderson, recently penned an article on Lexology.com
discussing several myths about design patent, including the misguided theory
that “Design patents can’t protect fashion.”
IP360 recently
posted an article discussing the “Benefits
of US Implementation of the Hague Agreement” and the effect on
international design patent prosecution. (account required). Several other commentators recently
discussed the ratification of the Hague Agreement as well, including JDSupra
, Tom’s
Hardware, and Bloomberg
Businessweek.
Foss Patents is
reporting on an anonymous ex parte
reexamination of Apple’s
design patent covering a page turning animation. Apple’s page turning design patents were
subject to widespread criticism when they first issued in light of traditional
books and the breadth of the patents. We
will monitor this reexamination and update as warranted.
For those who
live in the Boston area, the Boston Patent Law Association will be hosting a
roundtable lunch seminar on “The Design
Patent/Copyright Conundrum” on January 24, 2013 at Bingham McCutchen. The roundtable will include discussion of the
nature and scope of protection afforded by design patents and copyrights, the
overlap in protection between the two, standards for infringement, and remedies
available for infringement of design patents and copyrights.
No comments :
Post a Comment