The days of treating design patent applications as
unsophisticated and easily drafted alternatives to utility applications may be
at an end. More and more patent practitioners
are recognizing the power of design patent applications and particularly how
mastering advanced design patent techniques can provide broader
protection. If you have any reservations
about using such advanced techniques, let us assure you that design patent
giants the likes of Apple and Google have been doing it for years and with
great success. We outline a number of
advanced techniques using granted patents from these heavy weights.
Showing posts with label definiteness. Show all posts
Showing posts with label definiteness. Show all posts
Friday, April 12, 2013
Advanced Design Patenting Techniques – Part I
Labels:
Apple
,
continuation application
,
definiteness
,
Dennis Crouch
,
design
,
design patent
,
Federal Circuit
,
In re Owens
,
In re Zahn
,
multiple embodiments
,
Patenly-O
,
patent prosecution
,
support
,
written description
Friday, February 1, 2013
Apple v. Samsung – PART I - Judge Koh Weighs in on Definiteness in Design Patent Cases
This
week provided two new design patent decisions in the Apple v. Samsung saga and
a notice of review the ITC decision made in October of 2012. The two decisions, by Judge Lucy Koh (S.D.C.A.),touch
on important areas of design patent law, so we will be presenting our analysis
in a two-part series. Today’s post discusses Judge Koh’s decision on Samsung’s
Motion for invalidity of Apple’s design patents based on indefiniteness.
Labels:
Apple
,
claim construction
,
definiteness
,
design patent
,
galaxy
,
indefiniteness
,
ipad
,
iphone
,
Judge Koh
,
Samsung
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)